(The Trial of the Olympian gods Project)
|
|
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
|
Mastery of Constitutional Law |
Little or no understanding of
the Constitutional laws. No summary of laws given. |
Some understanding of the
Constitutional laws, but deficient in specific details pertaining to the
laws. |
Demonstrates a basic understanding
of the Constitutional Law cases assigned, but left out specific details. |
Demonstrates a complete and
thorough understanding of the Constitutional Law cases assigned in the case |
|
|
Knowledge of Greek
gods |
Left out facts or included facts
that were irrelevant to the assignment. |
One or two facts were presented
from the Greek Myth, but were not specific to the case assigned. |
Included most of the facts from
the Greek Myth that related to the case, but left out specific details. |
Included all facts from the
Greek Myth that related to the case assigned. |
|
|
Analysis of the
cases |
No application of the
Constitutional Law is made to the Greek Myth; no judgment is given; did not
include any CompuLegal web resource. |
A loose connection is made
between the Constitutional Law and the Greek Myth; judgment is made based on
at least 1 CompuLegal web resource. |
A connection between a
Constitutional Law and the Greek Myth is established, with correct judgment
based on 1 or more CompuLegal web resources |
Complete application of the
Constitutional Laws to the Greek Myth assigned and correct judgment given
based on 2 or more
CompuLegal web resources. |
|
|
Organization |
One typed page. Absence of MLA format.
Ideas are copied word for word from with no student input. Complete lack of
effort. |
One to two typed pages. MLA
format is absent. Ideas are weak and not supported. Facts were copied word
for word with little student input. Resources are not cited. |
Two to three typed pages that
follows MLA format. Ideas are understandable but support is limited.
Resources are not cited correctly |
Three to four typed pages that
followed MLA format. Ideas are presented clearly and are supported by
specific details. All resources are cited properly. |
|
|
Grammar and
Spelling |
8 or more grammatical errors;
incoherent. 8 or more spelling errors. |
6-7 grammatical errors present
that hinder comprehension. 6-7 spelling errors . |
4-5 grammatical errors in the paper,
but does not hinder comprehension. 4-5 Spelling errors detected |
No grammatical errors are
detected. No spelling errors are detected. |
|
Written by Peter J. Leddy. Last updated