Copyright 2003 Roll Call, Inc.
Roll Call
March 17, 2003 Monday
LENGTH: 1349
words
HEADLINE: Big Oil Quiet on
ANWR
BYLINE: By Brody Mullins ROLL CALL STAFF
BODY: Beginning this week, scores of
environmentalists will descend on Capitol Hill to warn Members of Congress that
allowing oil drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge would destroy
1.5 million acres of pristine wilderness.
But they won't be going up
against the adversaries that most observers of the debate over
ANWR had expected to play a prominent role in the debate.
The U.S. oil industry, in an effort to conserve political capital, has
quietly decided to sit out the battle over the Arctic refuge.
Instead,
ExxonMobil, ChevronTexaco, BP Amoco, Shell Oil, Conoco Phillips and Anadarko
Petroleum have decided to focus on other priorities in Washington.
"They
have faded away on this issue," said Roger Herrera, a lobbyist for Arctic Power,
a group funded by the state of Alaska to promote the
ANWR
legislation. "I don't speak with them very often anymore." After more than a
decade of costly and unproductive drives to expand exploration in the oil-rich
region, oil companies are shutting down their
ANWR lobbying
efforts even as President Bush and key Members of Congress push to approve more
drilling this year.
The shift, which has taken place over several years,
adds a counterintuitive element to the upcoming Congressional debate: While a
string of Democratic presidential candidates have blasted the legislation as a
giveaway to Big Oil, it is the state of Alaska, its residents and
Democratic-leaning labor unions that will lead the push to expand oil and gas
drilling in the state.
To be sure, the oil industry's trade group, the
American Petroleum Institute, is urging Congress to approve
ANWR legislation - but only as part of a comprehensive energy
package. "API supports the notion that this area ought to be explored," said
Mike Shanahan, a spokesman for the trade group. "It's a part of the larger
puzzle."
The oil giants also are major financial contributors to the
Alliance for Energy and Economic Growth, a group of businesses pressing for a
comprehensive energy policy bill that would include
ANWR
drilling. Red Caveney, the president of the American Petroleum Institute, sits
on the group's board.
But the oil companies themselves have scheduled
few meetings with lawmakers to discuss
ANWR while pumping a
tiny fraction of the $
24 million spent on lobbying last year
toward the effort.
"We're not lobbying
ANWR," said Lee
Warren, a spokesman for Anadarko Petroleum. "We are concentrating more on adding
more production from existing acreage, rather than looking for new acreage. We
already have major production up there."
"If asked our opinion, then we
would provide it," added Ian Stewart of BP Amoco, summarizing the company's
lobbying effort.
The domestic oil and gas industry had lobbied Congress
and the White House for years to open up
ANWR. But after a
string of defeats in the 1990s, the companies have shifted their resources to
more promising efforts, from prodding the federal government to build a
billion-dollar gas pipeline in Alaska to securing permission to drill in
less-controversial areas.
In the last session of Congress, the industry
even rebuffed a request from Alaska Republican Sens. Ted Stevens and Frank
Murkowski - the champions of the effort - to bankroll a $
15
million advertising campaign to build support for the legislation.
That's not to say that the oil companies oppose
ANWR
drilling. They simply have decided to focus their energy on more profitable
areas.
Conoco Phillips, for example, has concentrated on getting
Congress to sign off on an Alaska natural gas pipeline to deliver gas to the
lower 48 states.
"We just had to chose between two priorities - and for
us it's a gas pipeline," said Don Duncan of Conoco Phillips. Duncan said that
Conoco re-injects 8.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas back into the Earth each
day because a sufficient pipeline does not exist. "We find it hard to believe
that you are going to get
ANWR open and a pipeline built," he
said.
With the oil industry on the sidelines, the strongest campaign on
behalf of the
ANWR legislation comes from Arctic Power, a group
that does not make political donations and is currently in debt.
Herrera, Arctic's sole lobbyist in the three-person Washington office,
said he has not received a paycheck in nine months.
Herrera said that
the entire oil industry provides less than 1 percent of Arctic Power's annual
budget.
"Some of the companies didn't give a penny," Herrera said.
Instead, Arctic gets most of its funding from the state of Alaska, which
last week approved $
1.1 million for this year's lobbying
effort. Another million or so comes from businesses and residents in Alaska.
The group spends about a half-million dollars each year to lobby
Congress and employs a team of outside firms.
On Arctic's payroll are
Bartley O'Hara, a Democrat with close ties to the labor community, and Jack
Ferguson, who lobbies on most Alaska issues.
When Democrats took control
of the Senate in 2001, Arctic signed up Patton Boggs and senior lobbyist Tommy
Boggs. But with Republicans back in the Senate majority, Arctic last month
dumped the Democratic-leaning firm. "In the period after the election, their
skills became less valuable," Herrera said.
The Anchorage-based
nonprofit is led by a 50-person board of directors and three politically active
co-chairmen, including a former chairman of the Alaska state Senate's Finance
Committee and a onetime mayor of Kodiak.
On Capitol Hill, Arctic formed
an odd political partnership with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
when the union realized that
ANWR drilling could generate
hundreds of thousands of jobs for union workers by boosting demand for new
pipelines, tankers and drilling equipment. By teaming up with a major labor
union, Arctic Power gave Congressional Republicans an opportunity to make
inroads in the traditionally Democratic turf of union workers.
"It was
the one example that I can think of where we suited up in the same locker room,"
said Lee Johnson, a former Senate Republican leadership aide who organized the
pro-
ANWR coalition last year.
Still, the alliance has
consistently fallen just a few votes short of the needed 60 votes in the Senate
to overcome a threatened filibuster from Democratic presidential candidates John
Kerry (Mass.) and Joe Lieberman (Conn.).
But the work of the Teamsters
and the union's top lobbyist, Jerry Hood, did not go unnoticed.
When
Murkowski was elected governor in November, he considered tapping Hood, a
Democrat, to serve the remaining two years in his Senate term.
Hood also
sits on Arctic's board of directors and serves as one of the group's three
Capitol Hill chairmen.
This year, Arctic Power and the Teamsters hope to
add language to the budget reconciliation package in the House and Senate that
would open up
ANWR. The procedural move, expected to
play out in the next few weeks, would sidestep the threatened filibuster -
requiring the pro-
ANWR forces to rally a mere 50 votes to
approve the legislation.
Democrats decried the move. "The president
asked the Republican Budget Committee to drill in the pristine Arctic refuge and
tonight the committee has said: 'Let the drilling begin,'" complained Rep. Ed
Markey (D-Mass.) when Republicans began moving the legislation.
Nevertheless, the pro-exploration movement believes it is closer than
ever to that goal thanks to Arctic, the Teamsters and a few lucky breaks in
November.
In Missouri, Sen. Jean Carnahan (D) lost narrowly to
ANWR supporter and now-Sen. Jim Talent (R), while then-Rep.
John Sununu swiped New Hampshire's Republican Senate seat from Bob Smith, one of
the handful of Republicans who opposed
ANWR last year.
In another good omen for
ANWR backers, two wavering
Senators - Republican Norm Coleman (Minn.) and Democrat Mark Pryor (Ark.) -
indicated last week that they may support adding
ANWR to the
budget package.
Herrera said he was pleased that the election had
increased the chances for
ANWR this year. As for the oil
companies, "it used to be frustrating," he said, "but I've gotten used to it."
LOAD-DATE: March 17, 2003