says
"No", to Jim Crow.
Introduction:
Using Irene Taylor's book, Roll of Thunder,
as a spring board, this unit will begin by exploring the experience of living
in a world in which Jim Crow rules. It is our goal that this will allow the
student to realize that legal issues are human issues. From the beginning, the book will serve as a
bridge between the study of Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education
of Topeka. The role played by
significant individual leaders in the march to equal protection before the law
will be another component of the unit.
The issue of racism continues to plague our
country. An aim of this
multidisciplinary unit is to provide students with the skills and knowledge to
study this aspect of our history in a way that gives them insight into and
appreciation of the cause and consequences of unequal treatment before the
law. One outcome of this unit is that the students will learn that legal
issues are human issues.
Standards:
1. The student will read,
write, listen and speak for information and understanding.
2. Students will read,
write, listen, and speak for literacy response and expression.
3. Students will read,
write, listen, and speak for critical analysis and evaluation.
4. Students will read, write, listen , and speak for social interaction.
1.
Students will read the book Roll of
Thunder.
In small groups they will complete a
graphic organizer on one of the characters.
Inspiration
template used.
2. In the same small group, students will research
one of the four designated Civil Rights
leaders:
W.E.B.
DuBois and Booker T. Washington
Malcom
X and Martin Luther King Jr.
The same graphic organizer used with the literary
characters and an additional one will be used to organize information on each
leader.
3. The information for the graphic organizers will
be used to:
Write
a compare/contrast essay on either pair of leaders
Individual
assignment
Assessment
using the Grade 8 Language Arts Program Rubric.
Create
a slide show comparing and contrasting either pair of leaders
Small
Group: Assessment using the Evaluating
Student Presentations Rubric.
Students
will use analysis skills to prepare to participate in a small group discussion
on
the following:
1. Knowing what you know of the main
characters in Roll of Thunder, decide
which of the 4 Civil Rights Leaders would appeal to each.
Explain the reasons for your
decisions.
2. Having read Roll of Thunder and studied Plessy v. Ferguson, identify the
affects of the decision reflected in the book.
1. Students will use a variety of intellectual skills to demonstrate their understanding of major ideas,
eras, developments, and Turing points in the history of the United States and New York.
5. The students will use a
variety of intellectual skills to demonstrate their understand of the necessity
for establishing government;
the governmental system of the United States and other nations; the United
States Constitution; the basic civic values of American constitutional
democracy; and the roles, rights, and responsibilities of citizenship,
including avenues of participation.
Standards:
2. Students will access,
generate, process and transfer information using appropriate technologies.
Use texts and other library sources to
review background on the Constitution and the
Three-Fifths
Compromise.
Use TIPS Resources:
Dred
Scott - To introduce site and to provide background for the unit
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/Lessons/Epr/epr2.html
Equal
Protection - Introduction and background on Equal Protection
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/Lessons/Epr/epr1.html
Plessy
v. Ferguson
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/Lessons/Epr/epr3.html Crit.
Lesson 3 How did Plessy affect South?
Students will use incidents in the book to
answer
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/plessy.html-opening
page Plessy
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/plessyvis.html-visual
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/plessyiss.html-facts
of the case
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/plessyargo.html-arguments
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/plessyreas.html-reasoning
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/plessydec.html-decision
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/instruct2.html-instructions
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/instruct2.html#iss-forming
the
issue
question
Brown
v. Board of Education of Topeka
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/brown.html-opening
page
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/brownfacts.html-facts
of the case
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/brownvis.html-visual
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/browniss.html-analysis
of facts
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/brownreas.html-reasoning
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/browndec.html-reasoning
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/instruct2.html-instructions
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/welcome.html
-- Ask a legal eagle
Additional Resources: The Encyclopaedia Britannica Guide to Black
History
black history.eb.com/index2.html
Presentation Rubric – Evaluating Student Presentations
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Total |
Organization |
Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information. |
Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around.. |
Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow. |
Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow. |
|
|
Subject Knowledge |
Student does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about subject. |
Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions. |
Student is at ease, with expected answers to all questions, but fails to elaborate. |
Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all questions with explanations and elaboration. |
|
Graphics |
Student uses superfluous graphics or no graphics. |
Student occasionally uses graphics that rarely support text and presentation. |
Student’s graphics relate to text and presentation. |
Student’s graphics explain and reinforce screen text and presentation. |
|
Mechanics |
Students presentation has four or more spelling errors and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation has three misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation has no more than two misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation has no misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
|
Eye Contact |
Student reads all of report with no eye contact. |
Student occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of report. |
Student maintains eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes. |
Student maintains eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes. |
|
|
Elocution |
Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for student in the back of class to hear. |
Students voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. |
Student’s voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation. |
Student uses a clear voice and correct precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience can hear presentation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Points |
|
Developed by Information
Technology Evaluation Services,
NC Department of Public
Instruction
Jacqueline Herbsman’s Rubric for Student
Projects
Excellent -- Grade A
· more than 12 slides
· more than 5 graphics (sketches, graphs and pictures) included
· 3 or more interesting facts
· Written news article which answers all five questions
Advanced -- Grade B
· 10 to 11 slides
· 4 graphics.
· I or 2 interesting facts on pollution and its causes
· written news article with 4 questions answered
Acceptable -- Grade C
· 8 to 9 slides
· 3 graphics
· basic information
· written news article with three questions partially answered
Novice -- Grade D
· less than 7 slides
· 2 graphics
· basic description of problem
· written news article that has less than 3 questions answered